Gill V Evansville Sheet Metal Works

Brownsburg 963 n e 2d 453 457 ind.

Gill v evansville sheet metal works. Evansville sheet metal works 970 n e 2d 633 ind. We are asked to consider whether summary judgment for esmw on gill s negligence claim was proper. Evansville sheet metal works inc 970 n e 2d 633 637 n 4 ind. Evansville sheet metal works inc 940 n e 2d 328 330 ind.

Evansville sheet metal works inc 970 n e 2d 633 637 ind. Citing to older indiana cases the court stated. Standard principles of federal preemption guide this analysis. Evansville sheet metal works inc 970 n e 2d 633 637 ind.

Esmw allegedly worked as a contractor for al coa at a common work site with gale gill where materials containing asbestos were present and or used appellant s app. Evansville sheet metal works inc. Esmw motion for summary judgment with respect to sharon s complaint that gale had been exposed to asbestos and. Indiana case law defines fixtures and the best discussion comes from the indiana supreme court in gill v.

Gill appealed the trial court s ruling that the csor barred her contractor negligence claim and the court of appeals affirmed. Summary judgment is improper if the movant fails to carry its burden but if it succeeds then the nonmoving party must come forward with evidence establishing the existence of a genuine issue of material fact. Appellant plaintiff sharon gill sharon on her own behalf and on behalf of the estate of her husband gale gill gale appeals the trial court s grant of appellee defendant s evansville sheet metal works inc. Evansville sheet metal works inc 970 n e 2d 633 2012 wl 2384095 ind 2011 table thereby vacating the opinion of the court of appeals ind.

Evansville sheet metal works inc. June 25 2012 docket number. Gill sought and we granted transfer gill v. It has long been settled that a preemption analysis begins with the presumption that.

49s05 1111 cv 672 justia opinion summary.